As a student of Geopolitics in South Asia and MENA, I
have repeatedly held the United States responsible for the turmoil in the
region. I had even gone to the extent of saying that United States is the
biggest warmonger. The super power loves to initiate a conflict that goes to
the extent of anarchy and civil war.
This also invites other contenders to take part in proxy
wars. While the sole purpose of United States is to sell its arms, it wants to
keep others countries busy in fighting wars, rather than focusing on the
welfare of their people. This also gives it a chance to keep the countries
dependent on the World Bank and the IMF.
After having gone through what has been happening in the
United States, after Donald Trump taking oath as new President, I am obliged to
say that till recently the United States has been fanning hatred in the world,
but now it is facing the same. Demonstration on the inaugural day and
subsequent events clearly shows ‘Emergence of anarchy in the United States’. There
are growing fears within the United States these demonstrations may turn violent.
Over the years the United States has been breading
militants and using them in various countries to promote its agenda of keeping
the countries in constant state of war. The worst examples are Syria, Iraq and
Afghanistan. The blood thirsty mercenaries from around the world have landed in
these countries. It may also be said that these militants have been moved from
one country to another only to promote sale of arms.
One often wonders how the rebel groups get money. Even a
cursory look at Afghanistan and MENA shows that poppy and petrodollars are used
for purchasing arms. Various oil fields have been taken over by rebels, who are
selling oil to the developed nations. The center of drug has shifted from
golden triangle to Afghanistan.
Spy agencies of the United States have been alleging
Russia for rigging election. This on one hand proves the failure of these
agencies and on the other hand breakout of anarchy in the country that has been
creating turmoil around the world.
Over the years, United States has been ringing alarm of
nuclear assets going into the control of militants in various countries. One
may ask the same question, will nuclear assets of United States be in safe
hands, if the present demonstrations turn violent?
