In one of my recent posts I have stated that elections
are engineered in third world countries but in the US election is engineered in
an organized manner. After the victory of Donald Trump a debate has started in
the US that Russia has hacked election. Accepting all my inadequacies the
following points come to my mind. I request my reads, especially the think
tanks from the United States and those in power in Russia to help the world in
understanding the purpose behind this propaganda.
My first question is, has Russia attained power to rig
election of a country that has defeated USSR in Afghanistan, which led to
disintegration of the then second largest super power?
My second question, what is the motive behind this
propaganda?
My third question, what are the motive behind maligning
Russia or CIA and NSA?
My fourth question, why entry of Donald in White House is
being denied?
My fifth question, who is the bigger war monger, Donald
or mighty CIA, NSA and Pentagon?
My sixth question, is the media in the US also
subservient to military might?
As I have accepted earlier my inadequacies, kindly have
some patience to read my replies also.
My explanation to the first question is that there is a
clear motive behind accusing Russia, killing two birds with the same stone.
While the effort is aimed at maligning Russia, it is also exposing failures of CIA
and NSA. I will abstain from raising finger at Russia, but tend to agree with
those who have been saying that CIA/NSA and Pentagon have been acting on false
information, the worst being presence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
The reply to my second question may sound outrageous but
I could not resist from saying it. Despite all the propaganda against Donald,
Hillary lost the election. This is a defeat of those who could be termed
non-state actors, the Zionists. May be they believe that establishing a link
between Donald and Russia could stop his entry into the White House.
The reply to third question is that lately Russia has
defeated the US on various fronts, specifically in Syria. This has happened despite
the best efforts and tall claims of CIA and NSA. Those believing in maintaining
status quo are not ready to accept their defeat. However, while accusing Russia
they forget that they are also accepting failure of their intelligence agencies.
In my views they are accepting the supremacy of Russia to seek more funds for
CIA and NSA for their capacity building to open new war fronts around the globe,
the next front is South China Sea.
The possible explanation of fourth question is the
apprehension that Donald’s cordial relationship with Russia may lead to
withdrawal of support for ISIS and closing of the front in Syria. This is being
taken as a victory of Iran, which the Zionists don’t approve. Ironically, US
military might, intelligence and ‘embedded journalists’, who have been counting
days of Syrian President are not ready to accept their defeat.
To find reply to fifth question readers have to read my
latest post, US war mania. Over the years I have been saying that US is the
biggest arms supplier and to increase sale of arms it has to create new rebel
groups, provide them funds and training to sell arms to the incumbent governments
of these countries. Contrary to the impression created by dishonest western
media, I have a feeling that Donald wishes to focus more on domestic issues,
spend more funds on creation and improvisation of infrastructure for the
benefit of masses rather than spending billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money
on proxy wars. This policy of Donald is not approved by war mongers and owners
of the armament factories of the US.
Lesson of the story is that the US citizens are so
engrossed in ‘other’ activities that they even don’t have time to question why
tax payers’ money is being spent on wars rather than on millions of US citizens
still living below the poverty line. Groups having vested interest have been
preaching ‘change of regime’ in countries around the world must also do the
same at home.
