Showing posts with label South Korea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label South Korea. Show all posts

Saturday 12 August 2023

Iran unblocks funds stuck in South Korea

Iranian central bank chief said on Saturday that all of Iran's frozen funds in South Korea had been unblocked and would be available for use for non-sanctioned goods.

Mohammad Reza Farzin's post on social media appeared to confirm comments a day earlier by Washington, which said there would be restrictions on what Iran could do with any funds unfrozen under an emerging deal that has led to the release of five Americans from prison to house arrest in Tehran.

White House spokesperson John Kirby said Iran could only access the funds to buy food, medicine, medical equipment that would not have a dual military use. An estimated US$6 billion in Iranian assets have been held in South Korea.

The five Americans will be allowed to leave Iran once the funds are unfrozen, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters.

Farzin wrote in a post on messaging platform X, formerly known as Twitter, that the funds would be transferred to six Iranian banks in Qatar.

"Congratulations to the foreign exchange diplomacy team for successfully releasing seized foreign currency resources," he said in the post.

He added that the costs of converting the funds from South Korea's won currency to euros would be accepted by the "third country" where the money would be deposited to buy non-sanctioned goods.

 

Tuesday 13 June 2023

Iraq releases Iranian US$2.7 billion

Trade Bank of Iraq (TBI), an Iraqi bank, has released Iranian funds. According to a TBI statement the Funds have been released in accordance with a trilateral mechanism between Iran, Iraq and the United States. 

The Iranian assets that were recently released pertain from February to June 2023. This was according to the mechanism agreed upon between the three countries (Iraq, Iran and the United States of America) in force since 2018, said Aqeel al-Showeili, the communications specialist of TBI. 

The chairman of the Iran-Iraq joint chamber of commerce has recently announced that Iraq has released US$2.7 billion worth of Iranian assets.

Yahya Al-e Es’haq said a part of Iran’s frozen assets in Iraq has been allocated for the provision of funds needed by Iranian Hajj pilgrims.

Another part of the assets has been used to pay for the provision of basic commodities, he added.

In addition to the Iranian funds in Iraqi banks, there have been reports about the possible release of Iranian funds by South Korea. Officials from the United States and South Korea are holding talks over unfreezing Iranian funds held in South Korean banks, according to a South Korean daily.

The talks are focused on releasing the US$7 billion Iranian funds that have long been blocked in South Korean banks due to US sanctions on Iran. The funds are oil revenues dating back to the period prior to the re-imposition of US sanctions on Iran in May 2018.

Citing diplomatic and government sources, The Korea Economic Daily said in late May, “Korean and the US government officials are involved in working-level discussions under Washington’s leadership to unfreeze the Iranian funds.”

The newspaper said the funds, if released, would only be used for public and humanitarian purposes such as UN dues and COVID-19 vaccines.

“If all goes to plan, we expect our strained relationship with Iran to improve significantly,” said a Seoul government official.

If talks turn out to be successful, the frozen money will be allowed to be transferred to Iranian bank branches in neighboring Middle Eastern countries, not directly to Iran, to monitor the flow and use of the funds, sources said.

The Korean newspaper also pointed to media speculation over the concessions that Iran is expected to make in exchange for getting its money unfrozen.

It said that media reports alleged that Iran would release US prisoners and limit uranium enrichment levels to 60% in return. These speculations have so far not been confirmed by officials.

 

Tuesday 30 May 2023

United States and South Korea in talks to release frozen Iranian assets

Officials from the United States and South Korea are holding talks over unfreezing Iranian funds held in South Korean banks, according to a South Korean daily.

The talks are focused on releasing the US$7 billion Iranian funds that have long been blocked in South Korean banks due to US sanctions on Iran. The funds are oil revenues dating back to the period prior to the re-imposition of US sanctions on Iran in May 2018.

Citing diplomatic and government sources, The Korea Economic Daily said, “Korean and US government officials are involved in working-level discussions under Washington’s leadership to unfreeze the Iranian funds.”

The newspaper said the funds, if released, would only be used for public and humanitarian purposes such as UN dues and COVID-19 vaccines.

“If all goes to plan, we expect our strained relationship with Iran to improve significantly,” said a Seoul government official.

If talks turn out to be successful, the frozen money will be allowed to be transferred to Iranian bank branches in neighboring Middle Eastern countries, not directly to Iran, to monitor the flow and use of the funds, sources said.

The Korean newspaper also pointed to media speculation over the concessions that Iran is expected to make in exchange for getting its money unfrozen. It said that media reports alleged that Iran would release US prisoners and limit uranium enrichment levels to 60% in return. These speculations have so far not been confirmed by officials.

The frozen Iranian funds have been the biggest obstacle to improvement in Tehran-Seoul relations. They have also been a source of tensions between the two countries.

South Korea seems to be willing to improve its relations with Iran by releasing its funds. “Analysts said if the US$7 billion Iranian funds are released, it would significantly improve Seoul’s relations with Tehran, an energy and military power in the Middle East,” the Korean newspaper wrote.

“There is nothing South Korea can gain from becoming an enemy of Iran,” said Sung Il-kwang, a Korea University professor. “Korea will benefit from gaining access to Iran’s huge market.”

 

Saturday 27 May 2023

China-South Korea to strengthen chip industry

China and South Korea have agreed to strengthen dialogue and cooperation on semiconductor industry supply chains, amid broader global concerns over chip supplies, sanctions and national security, China's commerce minister said.

Wang Wentao met with South Korean Trade Minister Ahn Duk-geun on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference in Detroit, which ended on Friday.

They exchanged views on maintaining the stability of the industrial supply chain and strengthening cooperation in bilateral, regional and multilateral fields, according to a statement from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce on Saturday.

Wang also said that China is willing to work with South Korea to deepen trade ties and investment cooperation.

However, a South Korean statement on the same meeting did not mention chips, instead saying the country's trade minister had asked China to stabilize the supply of key raw materials, and asked for a predictable business environment for South Korean companies in China.

"The South Korean side expressed that communication is needed between working-level officials over all industries", not just for semiconductors, a source with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.

The source declined to be identified because they were not authorized to speak to the media. South Korea is in the crosshairs of a tit-for-tat row between the United States and China over semiconductors.

China's cyberspace regulator said last week that Micron had failed its network security review and that it would block operators of key infrastructure from buying from the company. The US has pushed for countries to limit China's access to advanced chips, citing a host of reasons including national security.

About 40% South Korea's chip exports go to China, according to trade ministry data, while US technology and equipment are necessary for South Korean chipmakers Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.

Friday 19 May 2023

Significance of G7 Summit

 


The three-day G-7 summit kicked off on Friday in Hiroshima. This is the seventh time Japan is hosting the meeting, the last time being in 2016 in Ise-Shima, a scenic coastal site in Mie prefecture. Directly on the heels of that gathering, Barack Obama paid a visit to Hiroshima - the first time a sitting US President had done so - which somewhat overshadowed the summit itself.

In Obama's famous 17-minute speech at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial, he asked, "Why do we come to this place, to Hiroshima? We come to ponder a terrible force unleashed in a not so distant past. ... That is why we come to Hiroshima, so that we might think of people we love - the first smile from our children in the morning; the gentle touch from a spouse over the kitchen table; the comforting embrace of a parent."

Seven years on, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, who was elected from a Hiroshima district, stands at the center of the stage, welcoming the G-7 leaders. Chairing the summit in Hiroshima has been one of Kishida's top priorities since the beginning of his premiership. In an exclusive interview with Nikkei for this week's Big Story, he said, "It is crucial to invite world leaders and young people to the site of the atomic bombing and allow them to see the consequences of the destruction."

Published just ahead of the summit, the story provides a comprehensive overview of Kishida's foreign policy agenda and explains what he hopes to achieve at the meeting, in his own words as well as those of diplomats and experts. This is a must-read for anyone seeking a more nuanced understanding of the summit.

 

 

Wednesday 3 May 2023

NATO to open Japan office for deepening Indo-Pacific engagement

Nikkei Asia reports, NATO is planning to open a liaison office in Tokyo, the first of its kind in Asia. The station will allow the military alliance to conduct periodic consultations with Japan and key partners in the region such as South Korea, Australia and New Zealand as China emerges as a new challenge, alongside its traditional focus on Russia.

NATO and Japan will also upgrade their cooperation, aiming to sign an Individually Tailored Partnership Program (ITPP) before the NATO Summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, on July 11-12. The two sides will deepen collaboration in tackling cyber threats, coordinate stances on emerging and disruptive technologies, and exchange notes on fighting disinformation.

The idea of opening a liaison office was first discussed between Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg during the latter's visit to Tokyo at the end of January. In mid-April, the alliance circulated a draft proposal among its 31 members.

The proposal is to open a one-person liaison office in Tokyo next year. Whether the Japanese side provides the office space or if NATO funds the station is still under negotiation. NATO has similar liaison offices at the United Nations in New York, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe in Vienna, as well as in Georgia, Ukraine, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova and Kuwait.

In many cases the host nation offers office space for NATO. If Tokyo provides the funding for a Western military alliance to have a foothold in Japan, it would symbolize a new phase in defense cooperation.

The intent to deepen cooperation is mutual. Japan plans to create an independent mission to NATO, separating it from the Embassy in Belgium, where it is currently based. A new ambassador will be dispatched, to relieve the NATO duties of Ambassador to Belgium Masahiro Mikami. Kishida told Stoltenberg of the plans at the January meeting.

Officials hope that the NATO-Japan signing of the ITPP would create momentum leading up to the Vilnius summit. The gathering is expected to be attended by the leaders of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand -- like last year -- signaling NATO's deeper engagement with the Indo-Pacific.

Last June, Kishida, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and then-New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern attended the NATO Summit in Madrid. Known as the Asia-Pacific partners (AP4) of NATO, they held a meeting on the sidelines.

Danish Ambassador to Japan Peter Taksoe-Jensen told Nikkei Asia in a phone interview that a NATO liaison office would be the first of its kind in the Indo-Pacific and more than just symbolic. "It would be a very visible, real way to strengthen the relations between Japan and NATO," he said.

The Danish Embassy acts as the contact-point embassy of the alliance in Japan and is coordinating with the member states in Tokyo regarding NATO-Japan collaboration.

Taksoe-Jensen noted that the geopolitical landscape has changed drastically since NATO issued its previous Strategic Concept in 2010.

"At the time, Russia was considered a potential partner and there was no mention of China. In 2022, at the Madrid Summit, allied leaders decided that Russia was no longer a partner but a foe, and that there was also an acknowledgment that China's rise would and could have an impact on trans-European security," he said.

"This is why it is important for NATO to keep up relations with our partners in this region." The envoy said that the liaison office would also reach out to other important actors in the region such as India and ASEAN countries.

Taksoe-Jensen said NATO-Japan cooperation, going forward, will focus on challenges that transcend regions, such as cyber threats, disruptive technology and disinformation activities.

This cooperation, Nikkei has learned, will be formalized in the coming weeks, when NATO and Japan will launch the ITPP to lay out cooperation on fields such as cybersecurity, disinformation and space. It will be an upgrade from the Individual Partnership and Cooperation Program (IPCP) that the two sides signed in 2014.

"There will also be a look at interoperability," Taksoe-Jensen said, regarding how NATO and Japanese forces work together in different areas. But he said it was "a step too far at the moment" to consider the two sides to bolster regional deterrence together.

Michito Tsuruoka, an associate professor at Keio University, said that the war in Ukraine has changed the way NATO sees China. "In addition to the problems China poses by itself, a new dimension has been added: that of China as a supporter of Russia. This now becomes directly related to Europe's security."

Stoltenberg repeatedly mentioned the danger of China and Russia collaborating during his trip to Japan, Tsuruoka told Nikkei Asia.

Tsuruoka said that NATO having a foothold in Tokyo would have a significant meaning for Japan. "It means that when NATO looks at Asia, including China, it will be doing so through Tokyo's prism. When the representative sends back information to NATO headquarters, it will always be via Tokyo."

NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu stressed Japan's importance in a statement to Nikkei on Wednesday.

"Among NATO's partners, none is closer or more capable than Japan," Lungescu said. "We share the same values, interests and concerns, including supporting Ukraine and addressing the security challenges posed by authoritarian regimes, and our partnership is getting stronger."

She noted long-standing cooperation between NATO and Japan, as demonstrated by Stoltenberg's visit to Japan at the start of the year and the Japanese foreign minister's participation at the meeting of NATO foreign ministers in April.

"The Secretary General has also invited the Prime Minister of Japan, as well as the leaders of our other Indo-Pacific partners, to the Vilnius Summit in July," Lungescu said.

"As to plans to open a liaison office in Japan, we won't go into the details of ongoing deliberations among NATO allies, but in general, NATO has offices and liaison arrangements with a number of international organizations and partner countries, and allies regularly assess those liaison arrangements to ensure that they best serve the needs of both NATO and our partners," she said.

 

Friday 4 November 2022

US crude oil exports to Asia to hit record high

According to a Reuters report, deliveries of US crude oil to Asia are set to touch a record 1.8 million barrels per day in November, 2022, as demand climbs on a widening discount to global oil price.

Refiners in China, India and South Korea are emerging as big buyers of US crude oil after several months of scooping up cheap Russian barrels. Asia's renewed buying reflects soaring demand for crude to produce diesel fuel and comes as Europe continues to stock up in the aftermath of Western sanctions on Russian purchases.

Overall, US crude exports last week touched a weekly record of 5.1 million barrels per day (bpd), boosted by higher shale production. The US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) traded at a nearly US$9 a barrel discount to Brent, as compared to a US$6 discount at the start of September. A wider discount makes US oil more affordable to foreign buyers.

South Korea is set to import a record 619,000 barrels per day (bpd) of US crude oil, according to Refinitiv, becoming the month's top Asian importer of US crude.

China will draw at least 450,000 bpd, its highest since December 2020 while India's demand is forecast to be the highest since March this year. Imports of both the countries are rising in the face of higher tanker rates up about 40% on some segments in October.

China's refineries are stepping up production with the end of maintenance overhauls and receipt of higher fuel export quotas to lift sagging merchandise exports.

There is also strong global demand for diesel that is encouraging refiners across the region to add production runs, said Matt Smith, analyst at data firm Kpler.

"With Asian refiners set to ramp up refinery runs, with China's sizeable product export quota, and with OPEC's core producers dialing back on output, demand for US crude is strong," he said. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies this month began cutting output by 2 million bpd on fears of lower demand amid slowing economies.

US oil production was 11.98 million bpd in August, as producers raise activity after pandemic cutbacks.

"Despite rising freight costs, US crude is still economical for Asian buyers, and the buying interest would remain as long as the arbitrage window is still open," a trader said.

 

Thursday 11 August 2022

US exports over 100 million gallons of ethanol

The United States exported 101.48 million gallons of ethanol and 1.01 million metric tons of distillers’ grains in June, according to data released by the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service on August 04. Exports of both products were up as compared to June 2021.

Ethanol is an organic chemical compound. It is a simple alcohol with the chemical formula C₂H₆O. Its formula can be also written as CH ₃−CH ₂−OH or C ₂H ₅OH, and is often abbreviated as EtOH. Ethanol is a volatile, flammable, colorless liquid with a characteristic wine-like odor and pungent taste.

Ethanol is naturally produced by the fermentation of sugars by yeasts or via petrochemical processes such as ethylene hydration. It has medical applications as an antiseptic and disinfectant. It is used as a chemical solvent and in the synthesis of organic compounds, and as a fuel source. Ethanol also can be dehydrated to make ethylene, an important chemical feedstock.

The 101.48 million gallons of ethanol exported in June was down when compared to the 147.06 million gallons exported in May, which was a four-year high, but up from the 82.09 million gallons exported during the same month of last year.

The US exported ethanol to more than 30 countries in June. Canada was the top destination for US ethanol at 41.2 million gallons, followed by South Korea at 13.64 million gallons and the UK at 12.02 million gallons.

The value of US ethanol exports was at US$324.77 million in May, down from US$410.39 million a month ago, but up from US$187 million in June 2021.

Total US ethanol exports for the first half of 2022 reached 827.39 million gallons at a value of US$2.25 billion, compared to 662.62 million gallons exported during the same period of 2021 at a value of US$1.27 billion.

The 1.01 million metric tons of distillers’ grains exported in June was up from both 966,108 metric tons in May and 938,280 metric tons in June 2021.

The US exported distillers’ grains to approximately three dozen countries in June. Vietnam was the top destination at 197,192 metric tons, followed by Mexico at 158,501 metric tons and Turkey at 109,819 metric tons.

The value of US distillers’ grains exports was at US$311.08 million in June, down slightly from US$311.85 million the previous month but up from US$248.47 million in June of last year.

Total US distillers’ grains exports for the first six months of the year reached 5.67 million metric tons at a value of US$1.67 billion, compared to 5.4 million metric tons exported during the same period of last year at a value of US$1.42 billion.

Sunday 31 July 2022

Nancy Pelosi sets off on Asia tour

According to South China Morning Post, US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has begun her anticipated trip to Asia, with her office naming four destinations but making no mention of Taiwan. 

This comes amid more stormy warnings from Beijing amid heightened tensions over her planned visit to the island.

Pelosi, No 3 in the line of US presidential succession, is leading a six-member congressional delegation to Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea and Japan, according to a statement released by her office on Sunday.

The statement skipped any mention of Taiwan, after days of intense speculation about a likely stop there fuelled tensions, with Beijing calling it a provocation and warning Washington against playing with fire.

“In Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea and Japan, our delegation will hold high-level meetings to discuss how we can further advance our shared interests and values, including peace and security, economic growth and trade, the Covid-19 pandemic, the climate crisis, human rights and democratic governance,” the statement quoted Pelosi as saying.

“America is firmly committed to smart, strategic engagement in the region, understanding that a free and flourishing Indo-Pacific is crucial to prosperity in our nation and around the globe,” the 82-year-old Democratic lawmaker said.

Beijing regards Taiwan to be a breakaway province, to be reunited by force if necessary, and warns against any official exchange with the self-governed island.

It earlier said Pelosi’s planned trip to Taiwan was a move to support Taiwan independence, in violation of one-China policy, followed by the United States.

On Thursday, Biden and China’s Xi Jinping spoke on the phone for over two hours. During the call, Biden tried to reassure Xi that US policy towards Taiwan has not changed.

“On Taiwan, President Biden emphasized that US policy has not changed and that the US strongly opposes unilateral efforts to change the status quo or undermine peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait,” an official readout on the White House website said.

After the leaders’ phone call, China’s Foreign Ministry quoted Xi as telling Biden that those who play with fire will perish by it and that they hoped the United States will be clear-eyed about this.

However, Pelosi indicated on Friday that she will be on a trip to Asia, but did not mention Taiwan. “I am very excited if we were to go to the countries that you will hear about along the way,” she said, Reuters reported.

White House spokesman John Kirby said, “Where she (Pelosi) is going to go and what she is going to do is up to the speaker to speak to.”

However, he added that the United States has not observed any signs of a specific military threat from China. “(We have) seen no physical, tangible indications of anything untoward with regard to Taiwan,” Kirby said.

  


Sunday 20 February 2022

South Korea and Iran to resume oil trade

South Korea and Iran are working closely on resuming oil trade and unfreezing Iranian funds, said South Korean Foreign Ministry. The country was previously one of Iran's leading Asian oil customers. The move coincides with negotiations resuming in Vienna to revive Tehran's 2015 nuclear agreement with world powers.

Tehran has repeatedly demanded the release of about US$7 billion of its funds frozen in South Korean banks under US sanctions, saying Seoul was holding the money hostage.

"Our side expressed hope for the resolution of issues related to sanctions such as the transfer of frozen funds upon the agreement on the restoration of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) now underway in Vienna," a South Korean statement said, using the full name of the nuclear accord.

The Iranian side stressed the importance of an early resolution of the matter of the frozen funds, it added.

Iran and South Korea are also discussing the trading of crude oil and oil products, on the condition sanctions are lifted as progress is made in nuclear negotiations, the statement said.

Previously South Korean oil buyers chiefly imported condensate, or an ultra-light form of crude oil, from Iran.

In Tehran, the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said Iran saw the talks as a possible indicator of attempts to re-establish trade ties with South Korea.

"This expert meeting's results can be seen as a test of South Korea's seriousness to solve existing problems between the two countries and normalizing ties, including through oil and condensate sales to Korea and Korean firms' investments in Iranian projects," Khatibzadeh told state media.

"Therefore, Iran will carefully follow up on the results of these negotiations in considering how to regulate relations between the two countries," Khatibzadeh added.

The United States reimposed sanctions on Iran in 2018 after then President Donald Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal under which Tehran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for US sanctions relief.

South Korea, the world's fifth-largest crude buyer, imported a total of 12.6 million tons of crude in January against 10.3 million tons a year ago, preliminary data from the Korea Customs Service showed. 

Friday 5 November 2021

Finding legitimacy of freezing Iranian funds

The United States has long used sanctions to obstruct Iran’s access to its foreign exchange reserves. The Obama administration (2009-2017) used sanctions to pressure Iran to curtail its nuclear program and come to the negotiating table.

Through, a series of regulations and designations, Washington made clear that foreign companies and financial institutions that provided material support to the Iranian financial system – even by simply processing Iran-related transactions – could find themselves similarly designated and therefore cut off from the US financial system

Foreign banks that hold Iranian foreign exchange reserves responded to these sanctions by freezing Iran’s access to their reserves. Iranian requests to make transfers or payments have often been refused, even when transactions are technically permissible under exemptions intended to protect humanitarian trade.

Limiting Iran’s access to the reserves weakened Iranian currency, made the economy more vulnerable to a balance of payments crisis, and made it harder for the Iranian government and Iranian companies to do business abroad.

In 2014, Iran gained access to a small portion of its reserves after it reached an interim nuclear deal the world’s six major powers – Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia, and the United States. Iran was allowed to repatriate paltry US$4.2 billion in oil revenues held abroad.

In 2015, the same countries reached a final agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), in which Iran agreed to significantly curb its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. As a result, Tehran regained access to more than US$100 billion in assets abroad.

In 2018, however, President Donald Trump withdrew from the JCPOA and reimposed wide-ranging US sanctions – effectively freezing Iran’s assets abroad again.

Iran’s total foreign exchange reserves amounted to US$115.4 billion at the end of the 2020 financial year, which ended on April 30, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). But as of October 2021, only US$12.2 billion was readily available and controlled by the monetary authorities after the re-introduction of financial sanctions, according to IMF estimate.

Most of Iran’s foreign exchange reserves have accrued in countries buying crude oil from Iran. Determining where exactly Iran maintains the reserves is difficult because the government treats information regarding the location and value of these reserves as a matter of national security.

Media reports, suggest that significant reserves are held in South Korea and Japan (historically major customers of Iranian oil) and Iraq (a country that buys electricity from Iran). Iran’s central bank also maintains accounts in several other countries, including China, Germany, India, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. Since the reimposition of US sanctions in 2018, Iranian economic diplomacy has focused in large part on bilateral negotiations with these countries to seek the release of funds.

Iran’s inability to access the reserves is more a function of the hesitance of financial institutions to process any Iran-related transactions – including humanitarian trade – without a green light from the US Administration. (Under U.S. law, humanitarian goods are not subject to sanctions, but some foreign companies and banks have been reluctant to do business with Iran for fear of violation of the US sanctions.) Faced with this predicament, Iran has pressured the South Korean, Japanese, and Iraqi governments to seek approvals from the United States.

For years, critics of the JCPOA have warned that unfreezing some or all of Iran’s foreign exchange reserves could be a windfall for the government. A key concern is that Tehran could use the billions of dollars to fund militant proxies and other malign activities. 

Historically, Iran has not drawn down large sums from its reserves. Part of the reason why Iran has accrued significant foreign exchange reserves is that, like most countries, it is happy to let its reserves grow. In 2002, Iran had around US$21 billion of foreign exchange reserves. By 2015, total reserves had risen to US$128 billion. In 2016, Iran regained access to its assets abroad as part of the JCPOA. By 2017, reserves had only fallen to US$112 billion. 

Even if the outflow of funds from the reserves were limited, the economic impacts of unfreezing could be significant. The accessibility of reserves serves to stabilize the value of Iranian currency and restore a degree of economic resilience in the face of crises.

Had Iran access to its reserves during the COVID-19 pandemic, it would have been better able to weather the economic impacts. Easier access to reserves would have helped Iran pay for imported medicine and medical equipment, especially Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and devices such as ventilators that were in short supply in the first phase of the pandemic. Payment challenges put Iran at the back of the line for these goods, despite it being one of the first countries hit by the pandemic.

In March 2020, Iran applied for an emergency financing package from the IMF worth US$5 billion because its reserves were not readily accessible. Iran technically qualified for such a loan, drawn from a pool of financing earmarked for economies facing balance of payments crises. In the end, the loan did not come through because of the opposition by the US and technical challenges posed by US secondary sanctions.

Tehran maintains that it needs the reserves at least in part for humanitarian reasons, to pay for COVID-19 vaccines and medical supplies and to pay dues to the United Nations.

Iran has also called on the Biden administration to unfreeze some of its reserves as a goodwill gesture. In September 2021, Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian urged the US to release at least US$10 billion before resuming talks on restoring the JCPOA.

“The Americans tried to contact us through different channels in New York (at the U.N. General Assembly) and I told the mediators if America's intentions are serious then a serious indication was needed,” Abdollahian later explained in a televised interview.

The United States, however, refused to offer concessions to bring Iran back to the negotiating table. From April to June 2021, Iran and the world’s six major powers held six rounds of talks. Diplomacy stalled in June during Iran’s presidential campaign and the political transition as Ebrahim Raisi took office and appointed his cabinet in August. On October 27, Iran’s new lead negotiator announced that nuclear talks would resume by the end of November.

Notably, Iran has complained that the US is obstructing the release of around US$7 billion of reserves reportedly held at two South Korean banks, the Industrial Bank of Korea and Woori Bank. In October 2021, Foreign Minister Abdollahian warned that Iran’s central bank could sue the South Korean banks if they didn’t release the funds. “US pressure (on Seoul) is a fact, but we cannot continue... to turn a blind eye to this question,” he said. 

Beyond the need for humanitarian aid, Iran is seeking access to the funds for two main reasons. First, at a political level, unfreezing the reserves is perhaps the clearest way that Iranian officials can indicate to domestic audiences that sanctions relief has been implemented. Just as critics of the JCPOA view the release of billions of dollars of reserves as a threat, Iranian officials point to those large numbers as a boon.

Second, Iran cannot operate normally in the global economy without the ability to use its foreign exchange reserves and to make transfers between currencies. For example, Iran runs trade surpluses with some countries and deficits with others. Effective reserve management requires converting reserves earned in countries where Iran runs a surplus, into the currency of those countries in which it is necessary to make up for a deficit.

Sunday 1 July 2012


Colonialism proliferating, though in a different form


It may not be wrong to say that the World War-III started no sooner did World War-II ended. Under the new arrangement countries are not conquered using military but by subjugating their sovereignty.


In the past the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund used to take control of policy making of recipient countries but now power of these countries to make decision are curtailed by establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO).

After the World War-II, super powers namely USA, USSR, and later on China have emerged. While USSR faced disintegration after its failed attempt to get access to warm waters by attacking Afghanistan, China preferred to focus on becoming an economic power. The USA got a free hand to establish its hegemony.

China is a perfect example of ‘If you can’t kill your enemy, make him friend but never forget you have to kill him one day’. USA has emerged a major investor in China and also a major buyer of made in China products. The policy is driven by the lust to control Chinese economy.

Economic sanctions are imposed on countries trying to the US policy but all the decisions are driven by protecting its own interest and/or its peripheries. This is evident from the latest US decision to exempt India, Malaysia, South Korea, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Turkey and Taiwan buying oil from Iran. These countries are either the major buyers of made in USA arsenal or supplier of goods and services to the super power.

United Nations (UN) has also become subservient as most of the decisions are made by the permanent members enjoying veto powers. Any decision by the international community can be turned down by these countries.  However, if a rubber stamp is needed, UN endorses military action, the most recent examples being Libya and Syria. Iran has been facing economic sanctions for more than three decades.

Different blocs have been created for the collective exploitation and now to establish US hegemony and developing regional powers. India has been given the status of regional super power. Commonwealth keeps on reminding the sovereign countries that they were British colonies and are still under the thumb of Monarchy.

Economic assault has been initiated under the WTO that gives legal cover to the financial atrocities of the developed countries. These countries control economies of poor sates through multinational companies (MNCs). This is best understood when one looks at the balance sheets and profit and loss statements of Fortune-500, which has further reduced to Fortune-50 companies,

But armies still play key role in conquering countries, with US leading Nato member counties. Usually the campaign starts in the name of restoration of democracy. Regime Change Plans are executed by funding rebels and proving them arsenal. This is in no way any attempt to make their lives better but to keep the armament factories running at full capacities.